I must agree. From the tone of the comments you can almost hear him trying to convince people that these intercepts of over 20 g/t are not of significance.

"Our consultants have also advised us that they do not anticipate the currently completed drilling will result in a significant material change in the tonnage or grade of the mineral resources at the deposit"

Notice a change in his tone from previous releases?

Would love to get some insight from a geologist on whether this statement is reasonable. I am not a geologist, but when I look at the grades reported they seem to be greater than the current 7.92 g/t for the defined zone?

Also, does anyone know whether any of these holes would add to the total defined zone, ie. tonnage defined?

It would be great to show that these results actually would reasonably add to the grade or tonnage of the defined zone.

They did not want to release these results (I suspect their lawyers made them), so now it would be great to show that they have intentially mislead investors through their public interpretation of the released results.

DO NOT TENDER YOUR SHARES. There is more gold in them thar hills.