With all due respect, irritating the irritant is a good strategy in which he back-pedals and he shows his true colors, thereby showing his bias. No, I think it's just fine to address the irritant as you can view him as the contrarian denomination. The fact that he happens to be a two-headed person who shares breakfast cereal with Kag is not relevant here. I welcome discussion in which strengths and weaknesses, upside and downside, are all discussed. If you want rah-rah and nothing but rah, well I don't know what to tell you.