Reducing human suffering by detecting cancer earlier with patented technology
BioCurex's RECAF(tm) marker is found in all types of major cancers
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

Email Updates

Search

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - FRIDAY MAY 25TH, 2012

FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc.

  • Aim to develop and manufacture the best technology graphite in the world
  • Additional shareholder value will come from investment in commercialized graphene through joint venture partner, Grafoid Inc.

Read More   |   *SPONSOR

INTERNATIONAL PBX VENTURES (TSX:PBX) Signs Copaquire Joint Venture Option Agreement - $90M Potential Payment Read More

AGORACOM Maintenance Alert: Friday Evening Downtime for About an Hour Read More

LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMR) Graphite and Zinc Price Outlook is Favourable Through 2013  Read More   |   *SPONSOR

 

 

Message: Trademarks in Question?

080115_sheen
Rank: [?]
Treasurer
Points: [?]
835
Rating: [?]
Votes: 11 Score: 2.7
  • Currently 2.7/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: Trademarks in Question?

posted on Jun 25, 09 11:58AM

Geographical area?

How about planet Earth?

Which geographical area is the limit? Vancouver, BC? Canada? US? China?

Why not just register the trademark?

I want to hear from the horses mouth why BioCurex feels that an unregistered trademark is suitable for a company that has global aspirations for its products.

Maybe....it just isn't necessary to register the the trademark. Fine. I can live with it. I like the company and am really more concerned with patent protection than trademark protection.

For the Brits:

http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/tm/t-about/t-protect/t-protect-unreg.htm

"How do I protect my unregistered trade mark?

Section 5(4)(a) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 prevents the registration of a mark by virtue of passing off.

You or your company must prove, through factual evidence, that

  • you have an established trade mark that has acquired a reputation and/or goodwill in the mind of the relevant public;
  • the offending trade mark has been, or is likely to be, confused with your established trade mark; and
  • your business under your established trade mark has been, or is likely to be, "damaged” by use of the offending trade mark."

New Message

Please login to post a reply

AGORACOM Quick Tips

Small & Micro Cap 2.0 Blog by George Tsiolis ... Read it Now

President's D.D.

New feature: Hub Presidents can add important links here.

Stock Quote