>If this cannot be done now, given all the past inuendo, then this is either a scam or management is >inept at communication.

I'm inclined to think that RECAF is real. If the RECAF antibody wasn't, then wouldn't someone have surely blown the horn on them long ago? Goshen, or Abbott?

Now, just speculation, and I mean no disrespect to Moro et al. But could cleverly-framed confidentiality agreements shield such a monumental shenanigan from the light of day? We usually hear of such contractual deceptions from union labor machinations. But I've never heard of such a thing in this sphere.

BTW, some weeks ago, I emailed to a respected Wall Street Journal science writer (a frequent contributor to the print issue, not some internet blogger) a brief inquiry as to what he thought about RECAF; whether Recaf was real, or a mirage.

I actually got an answer back, the same day. He said he had no idea if RECAF was real, and that he had never heard of Biocurex.