I think the moderator tied my aliases to my original "erthang"alias. I called out "Goldseeker" mostly because he was 95% speculation and 5% facts, or so it seemed. However, 95% of the time he spoke "as a matter of fact". That pissed me off and I would let him have it, because the truth was he was ignorant and misleading other investors. I took it as arrogance on his part. He is what they call a "buster" from where I come from. So to answer your question, if you want him kicked off, IMO, report him as an instigator who is detrimental to the board by spreading false information with no facts to support. He speculates with a negative spin on the company, but speaks as the authority. Also, cite his attacks and belittling comments. I would set him up and then let him hang himself with responses to my posts, building a case against him. But the ? is, would all that effort be worth it? He could reappear under a different alias like I did.