Operating Gold Mines - Quebec & Peru
Canadian Gold Producer with significant GOLD Reserves
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - FRIDAY MAY 25TH, 2012

FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc.

  • Aim to develop and manufacture the best technology graphite in the world
  • Additional shareholder value will come from investment in commercialized graphene through joint venture partner, Grafoid Inc.

Read More   |   *SPONSOR

INTERNATIONAL PBX VENTURES (TSX:PBX) Signs Copaquire Joint Venture Option Agreement - $90M Potential Payment Read More

AGORACOM Maintenance Alert: Friday Evening Downtime for About an Hour Read More

LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMR) Graphite and Zinc Price Outlook is Favourable Through 2013  Read More   |   *SPONSOR

 

 

Message: CSC - Where are you?

100_0116
Rank: [?]
President
Points: [?]
2320
Rating: [?]
Votes: 73 Score: 3.6
  • Currently 3.6/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Vote and Dissent

posted on Aug 30, 11 11:45PM

I believe that we can vote no for both items and still dissent ---see below taken from MIC- so I say we vote no as well as dissent-- comments please?????????????

The filing of a Dissent Notice does not deprive a Registered Shareholder of the right to vote at the Century Meeting.

However, the CBCA provides, in effect, that a Registered Shareholder who has submitted a Dissent Notice and who

votes FOR the Arrangement Resolution will no longer be considered a Dissenting Shareholder with respect to that

class of securities voted FOR the Arrangement Resolution, being the Century Common Shares. The CBCA does not

provide, and Century will not assume, that a proxy submitted instructing the proxyholder to vote against the

Arrangement Resolution, or an abstention, constitutes a Dissent Notice, but a Registered Shareholder need not vote

its Century Common Shares against the Arrangement Resolution in order to dissent. Similarly, the revocation of a

proxy conferring authority on the proxyholder to vote FOR the Arrangement Resolution does not constitute a

Dissent Notice. However, any proxy granted by a Registered Shareholder who intends to dissent, other than a proxy

that instructs the proxyholder to vote against the Arrangement Resolution, should be validly revoked in order to

prevent the proxyholder from voting such Century Common Shares in favour of the Arrangement Resolution and

thereby causing the Registered Shareholder to forfeit its Dissent Rights

New Message

Please login to post a reply

AGORACOM Quick Tips

AGORACOM 100 - The Top 100 Small Caps ... Find Your Next Investment

President's D.D.

Audio file of the conference call, highly recommended! read more

Hub Leaders