Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Quellaveco vs Schaft Creek
2
Feb 18, 2012 11:50AM
6
Feb 18, 2012 12:21PM
3
Feb 18, 2012 12:35PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 02:33PM
2
Feb 18, 2012 02:34PM

Feb 18, 2012 03:08PM
2
Feb 18, 2012 03:28PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 04:05PM
4
Feb 18, 2012 04:31PM
3
Feb 18, 2012 04:45PM
2
Feb 18, 2012 04:46PM
2
Feb 18, 2012 04:47PM
10
Feb 18, 2012 05:23PM

Feb 18, 2012 05:43PM
5
Feb 18, 2012 05:51PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 05:56PM
2
Feb 18, 2012 05:57PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 06:03PM

Feb 18, 2012 06:04PM

True web but when you are roughly ball-parking the potential take out price. There is a tremendous amount of valuable forsight provided in the resource size alone without even getting into the potential political and environmental impact (though i realize that these weigh heavy in the game).This may help light a fire under the investment community's A's now.

I have a good friend who was speaking directly with a very large player in the Junior Canadian Comodity Markets about 14 months ago and he was heavy into Antares prior to buyout and a few other SA large projects. He pressed the person for their opinion on CUU. They knew a fair bit about the project and stated to him that their only reason for not investing was the option agreement. Reason being, like all of us hear, with accounting degrees, mining expertise, or myself (absolutely no experience whatsoever other than huevos grande), they cannot pretend to understand what these scenarios equate to in the 'End Game'.

So, I think the take-home message in that is simply this/......it's not that they don't like it, or think it's a great project and very undervalued. They just can't figure out ahead of time what their return will be. And like a bank, they want to know, not after the fact. Interesting

LDubs


Feb 18, 2012 06:41PM
4
Feb 18, 2012 07:30PM
5
Feb 18, 2012 07:45PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 08:12PM
3
Feb 18, 2012 08:12PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 08:15PM
11
Feb 18, 2012 08:47PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 09:05PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 09:15PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 09:47PM

MES
Feb 18, 2012 09:54PM
8
Feb 18, 2012 11:07PM
5
Feb 18, 2012 11:10PM
1
Feb 18, 2012 11:13PM
3
Feb 19, 2012 01:09AM
1
Feb 19, 2012 01:20PM
3
Feb 19, 2012 02:01PM
1
MES
Feb 19, 2012 04:31PM
6
Jun 04, 2012 09:02AM
5
Jun 05, 2014 03:14PM
1
Jun 05, 2014 03:25PM
2
Jun 05, 2014 03:55PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply