True web but when you are roughly ball-parking the potential take out price. There is a tremendous amount of valuable forsight provided in the resource size alone without even getting into the potential political and environmental impact (though i realize that these weigh heavy in the game).This may help light a fire under the investment community's A's now.

I have a good friend who was speaking directly with a very large player in the Junior Canadian Comodity Markets about 14 months ago and he was heavy into Antares prior to buyout and a few other SA large projects. He pressed the person for their opinion on CUU. They knew a fair bit about the project and stated to him that their only reason for not investing was the option agreement. Reason being, like all of us hear, with accounting degrees, mining expertise, or myself (absolutely no experience whatsoever other than huevos grande), they cannot pretend to understand what these scenarios equate to in the 'End Game'.

So, I think the take-home message in that is simply this/......it's not that they don't like it, or think it's a great project and very undervalued. They just can't figure out ahead of time what their return will be. And like a bank, they want to know, not after the fact. Interesting

LDubs