take it easy, take a deep deep breath and let it allllll out.

I too was slightly suspicious of a new poster, but anyone that provides a legitimate e-mail address with name deserves a little bit more respect from the board than what has so far been provided.

So what if his reason for investing or decisions made are not perfect or the knowledge beforehand less than many of the posters here, that is what the board is for, and whether or not you agree with his investment decision, he is a shareholder and has been transparent to date, more so in an initial post than those that shall remain nameless were.

lets provide the benefit of the doubt before we go all crazy shooting up the saloon.

That being said I appreciate your comments and posts.

And for the record I despised what was being written about GCR, so regardless of why management made the decision, a proactive stance recognizes the needs of certain shareholder requirements for transparency and disclosure of the truth.