Good to see that the cps readings and intervalls relate very well to assay results from DDH´s !

my previously highlighted best off-scale intervalls per DDH (#117,129,131) have shown the best GT results (grade x thickness of intervall) today , good correlation reference for future cps readings:

#117: 5.0 m total 74,03 GT (maximum: 35,5%)

#118: 0.4 m total 3,75 GT (max. 4,82%)

#119: --- 0,04 GT (max. 0,07%)

#120: --- 0,42 GT (max. 0,31%)

#121: 1.0 m total 13,13 GT (max. 4,21%)

#122: 1.6 m total 23,26 GT (max. 22,2%)

#123: 0.4 m total 2,68 GT (max. 1,97%)

#124: 0.1 m total 0,58 GT (max. 0,28%)

#125: 1.1 m total 12,28 GT (max. 5,96%)

#126: 2.1 m total 14,94 GT (max. 19,80%)

#127: --- 0,51 GT (max. 0,80%)

#128: 0.3 m total 2,76 GT (max. 2,19%)

#129: 4.7 m total 92,94 GT (max. 38,90%)

#130: 2.3 m total 23,21 GT (max. 24,10%)

#131: 5.95 m total 130,19 GT (max. 48,10%)


http://www.hathor.ca/i/pdf/Assays_84_87_117-131.pdf


FANTOMAS