Nickel77

My memory is somewhat fuzzy on that particular post due to the lapse of time. However, after originally reading the post, I do remember that it was painfully clear this individual was very irritated/upset with ISM. I do remember that he went through the effort of establishing himself as an expert in the field of geology. I do believe that he addressed in general terms the issue as to what he thought the amount of nickel ISM was sitting on. His opinion on the nickel resource is of little interest to me now as I now know this was just another volley in the mud-slinging that is lbe vs ism. Of particular interest to me were his comments as to nickel in pentlandite (interestingly his poster name of choice). His comments (by my memory)stand in stark contrast to what ISM has stated in recent MD&A's. I would be much obliged if you could obtain a copy of this post and forward it as you stated.

As to your issues with tantallon - I do not know enough to comment.

I do find it very interesting that you have determined that ISM was responsible for having the "post immediately removed". Have you ever considered that perhaps the poster realized that he had made a mistake of gigantic proportion (especially noting his role as VP of a neighboring company) and subsequently requested SH to remove his offending post? I suppose not.

FP