UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case No. 3:12-cv-03876-VC (PSG)

JOINT MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS AND DEADLINES PENDING RESOLUTION OF OBJECTIONS TO CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Case No. 3:12-cv-03877-VC (PSG)

Plaintiffs v.

ZTE CORPORA TION, et Defendants.

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.

al.,LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs v.

NINTENDO CO., LTD, et al. Defendants.

Case No. 3:12-cv-03881-VC (PSG)

TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC, et al.,

Case No. 3:12-cv-03880-VC (PSG)Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs Technology Properties Limited LLC, Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, and Patriot Scientific Corporation’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., and Nintendo of America Inc. (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) in the above-titled and numbered civil cases (collectively, “this Action”), respectfully move the Court to stay all deadlines and proceedings in this Action, except for the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their objections to the recently issued Claim Construction Report and Recommendation (or otherwise seek to alter the findings in Claim Construction Report and Recommendation). In support of the requested stay, the parties would show the Court:

1. Magistrate Grewal’s Claim Construction Report and Recommendation (Dkt. Nos. (109) in case 3:12-cv-03876-VC, (104) in case 3:12-cv-03877-VC, (117) in case 3:12-cv-03880- VC, (106) in case 3:12-cv-03881-VC) issued September 22, 2015 (the “Claim Construction Report”).

2. The Claim Construction Report construed the term “an entire oscillator disposed

upon said integrated circuit substrate” as “an [oscillator] located entirely on the same semiconductor substrate as the [central processing unit] that does not require a control signal and whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal” (the “Entire Oscillator Construction”).

1. Any objections to the Claim Construction Report are due October 6, 2015.

2. The parties hereby stipulate that all accused products of all Defendants in this

Action do not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent 5,809,336 under the Entire Oscillator Construction.

5. If Plaintiffs do not file an objection to the Claim Construction Report on or before October 6, 2015, or, if Plaintiffs timely file an objection to the Claim Construction Report and the Court does not reject or materially modify the construction of the term “an entire oscillator disposed upon said integrated circuit substrate”, and thereby accepts the Entire Oscillator Construction, the Parties will within, three (3) business days of (a) Plaintiffs’ failure to timely file an objection (i.e., October 9, 2015) or (b) the Court’s acceptance of the Entire Oscillator Construction, request the Court to enter final judgment of non-infringement in favor of Defendants in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

6. Close of fact discovery is currently set for October 8, 2015. Parties with the burden of proof are currently set to serve initial expert reports on November 6, 2015.

7. The parties have agreed to stay all proceedings and deadlines in this Action pending the Court’s ruling on any objections to the Claim Construction Report.

8. A stay will prevent the time and resources of both the Court and the parties from being wasted should the Court overrule Plaintiffs’ objections to the Claim Construction Report.

9. If the Court sustains Plaintiffs’ objections and reconsiders the construction of the term “an entire oscillator disposed upon said integrated circuit substrate,” the parties will jointly propose a revised scheduling order for the Court’s consideration.

10. To be clear, this stipulation does not prevent any Defendant from filing objections to the Claim Construction Report, and no Defendant is required to file objections to the Claim Construction Report in order to preserve its appellate rights.

6 Dated: September 25, 2015 7

NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.

/s/ Barry J. Bumgardner
Edward R. Nelson, III (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected]
Brent Nelson Bumgardner (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected]
Barry J. Bumgardner (Pro Hac Vice)

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

/s/ Aaron Wainscoat

Mark D. Fowler (SBN 124235) Aaron Wainscoat (SBN 218337) Erik R. Fuehrer (SBN 252578) 2000 University Avenue

East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Tel. (650) 833-2000
Fax (650) 833-2001

James M. Heintz (pro hac vice) 11911 Freedom Dr.
Reston, VA 20190
Tel. (703) 733-4000

Fax (703)733-5000

Robert C. Williams
401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, California 92101 Tel. (619) 699-2700
Fax (619) 699-2701

Attorneys for Defendants
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

/s/ Charles M. McMahon

MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP Charles M. McMahon (pro hac vice) [email protected]
Hersh H. Mehta (pro hac vice) [email protected]

Therefore, the parties request that the Court grant this Motion, and enter an Order staying further proceedings and upcoming deadlines in this Action, except for the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their objections to the Claim Construction Report, until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

12 [email protected]

Thomas Christopher Cecil (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected]
Stacie Greskowiak McNulty (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected]

John Murphy (Pro Hac Vice)

[email protected]
16 3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300

17
18
19
20
21
22

Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Phone: (817) 377-9111 Fax: (817) 377-3485

BANYS, P.C.

Christopher D. Banys (SBN 230038) [email protected]
Jennifer Lu Gilbert (SBN 255820) [email protected]

Christopher J. Judge (SBN 274418) [email protected]
Richard Cheng-hong Lin (SBN 209233)

23
24 [email protected]

1032 Elwell Court, Suite 100

1. 25 Palo Alto, California 94303

   Phone: (650) 308-8505

2. 26 Fax: (650) 353-2202

3. 27 ALBRITTON LAW FIRM

28

Eric M. Albritton (Pro Hac Vice)

Case3:12-cv-03880-VC

Document118

Filed09/25/15 Page5 of 7

1 [email protected] P.O. Box 2649

227 West Monroe Street Chicago, IL 60606 [Tel.] (312) 372-2000 [Fax] (312) 984-7700

Fabio E. Marino (SBN 183825) [email protected]
L. Kieran Kieckhefer (SBN 251978) [email protected]
275 Middlefield Road, Ste. 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025
[Tel.] (650) 815-7400
[Fax] (650) 815-7401

BRINKS GILSON & LIONE
William H. Frankel (pro hac vice) [email protected] Robert Mallin (pro hac vice) [email protected]
NBC Tower, Suite 3600
455 N. Cityfront Plaza Drive Chicago, IL 60611
[Tel.] (312) 321-4200
[Fax] (312) 321-4299

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON Scott R. Miller (SBN 112656) [email protected]
333 South Hope Street, 43rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90071 [Tel.] (213) 617-4177 [Fax] (213) 620-1398

Attorneys for Defendants,
ZTE CORPORATION and ZTE (USA) INC.

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.

/s/ Wasif Qureshi
Michael J. McKeon, pro hac vice [email protected]
Christian A. Chu (CA SBN 218336) [email protected]
Richard A. Sterba, pro hac vice [email protected]
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
1425 K Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 783-5070 Facsimile: (202) 783-2331

Wasif Qureshi, pro hac vice [email protected]

1. 2 Longview, Texas 75606

2. 3 Phone: (903) 757-8449

4

Fax: (903) 758-7397

Attorneys for Plaintiff

1. 5 PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS LLC

2. 6 /s/ Charles T. Hoge

KIRBY NOONAN LANCE &HOGE LLP

1. 7 Charles T. Hoge (SBN 110696)

2. 8 [email protected]

350 Tenth Avenue, Suite 1300 9 San Diego, California 92101

10

Phone: (619) 231-8666

Attorneys for Plaintiff
11 PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 12
13 /s/ William L. Bretschneider

SILICON V ALLEY LA W GROUP

1. 14 William L. Bretschneider (SBN 144561) [email protected]

2. 15 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 750 San Jose, California 95113

3. 16 Phone: (408) 573-5700

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LLC

Fax: (408) 573-5701

17
18 TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case3:12-cv-03880-VC

Document118

Filed09/25/15 Page6 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

FISH & RICHARDSON P .C. 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2800 Houston, TX 77010
Telephone: (713) 654-5300 Facsimile: (713) 652-0109

Olga I. May (CA SBN 232012) [email protected]
FISH & RICHARDSON P .C. 12390 El Camino Real

San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-4745 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099

Attorneys for Defendants
LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS USA. INC.

COOLEY LLP

/s/ Matthew J. Brigham
Cooley LLP
Matthew J. Brigham (SBN 191428) [email protected]
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400

Stephen R. Smith (pro hac vice) [email protected] 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Suite 700

Washington, DC 20004 COOLEY LLP
Telephone: (703) 456-8000 Facsimile: (703) 456-8100

Attorneys for Defendants
NINTENDO CO., LTD and NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.

Case3:12-cv-03880-VC Document118 Filed09/25/15 Page7 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ATTESTATION

I, Wasif Qureshi, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this JOINT MOTION TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS AND DEADLINES PENDING RESOLUTION OF OBJECTIONS TO CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the signatories listed above have read and approved the filing of this brief.

/s/ Wasif Qureshi
Wasif Qureshi, pro hac vice [email protected]
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 2800 Houston, TX 77010
Telephone: (713) 654-5300 Facsimile: (713) 652-0109

Attorneys for Defendants
LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS USA. INC.