High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - WEDNESDAY MAY 30TH, 2012

GOLDEN HOPE MINES (TSXV:GNH) Confirms High Grade Intersection of 64.1 g/t Au (Gold) over 1m Read More 

  • The screen metallic analysis returned 82 g/t Au for an average grade of 93.5 g/t Au.
  • Two additional fire assays on the original pulp done prior to the screen metallic analyses returned 0.22 g/t Au and 0.12 g/t Au for an average fire assay grade of 0.41 g/t Au. The weighted average of all the fire assays and screen metallic assays from this 1-metre section in hole BD2011-184 is 64.1 g/t Au.

Sonomax® eers™ Custom Earbuds Announces Sponsorship of MUTEK 2012

CONTINENTAL ENERGY  Geothermal Energy Project Receives US$ 11.5 Million Grant Read More * Client

AGORACOM Launches Graphite Stocks Blog

Top Stories

  • FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc. Read More   |   *SPONSOR

  • LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMK) Paul Gill Discusses Exploration Initiative with James West of Midas Letter Read More   |   *SPONSOR
  • GRAPHITE DEMAND Seen Surging from Fuel Cells, Nuclear Reactors, Graphene Read More

 

 

Message: A little confusion.

Img_1605_2
Rank: [?]
Treasurer
Points: [?]
352
Rating: [?]
Votes: 38 Score: 3.4
  • Currently 3.4/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: A little confusion....NO confusion//see TME map too..

posted on Mar 01, 08 01:26PM

Great DD JD. I am also having a difficult time rationalizing (as a non geo but old R&D guy) the two figures in the FNC NR. One is RAW data, other is Prelim interpretation. So looking at someone's interpretations, what did he give us. Lots of red dots (EM anomalies)-good-but they are not consistent with the RAW data plot; what are those dots in the blue spaces well removed from mag bumps ? Also the conductor lines---drawn thru selected dots but ignoring other ones ! And now to that TME map on its web site showing the 3 drill holes your referred to: DDH-1 and sizeable conductor line (NE/SW) is closish to the key big mag bump, DDH-2 is almost on top of the red dot in the FNC plot and DDH-3 and very long conductor line in in the middle of lengthy NE/SW mag bump. I would be happy if you can explain some of these apparent inconsistencies or maybe I'm just trying to hard to make sense of much too complex data. Finally, I was annoyed that FNC is now calling these plots "Eagle One Project" whereas in the past they were labelled "McFaulds Lake Area". RN must have called him on that one !!!

Despite all this by the way, I added FNC to my holdings on Friday (got the low $2.52 so was lucky there)

Heading to AZ for a couple of months tomorrow so will be wifi'g from the desert. Good luck in the us NOT long guys.

New Message

Please login to post a reply