High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - WEDNESDAY MAY 30TH, 2012

GOLDEN HOPE MINES (TSXV:GNH) Confirms High Grade Intersection of 64.1 g/t Au (Gold) over 1m Read More 

  • The screen metallic analysis returned 82 g/t Au for an average grade of 93.5 g/t Au.
  • Two additional fire assays on the original pulp done prior to the screen metallic analyses returned 0.22 g/t Au and 0.12 g/t Au for an average fire assay grade of 0.41 g/t Au. The weighted average of all the fire assays and screen metallic assays from this 1-metre section in hole BD2011-184 is 64.1 g/t Au.

Sonomax® eers™ Custom Earbuds Announces Sponsorship of MUTEK 2012

CONTINENTAL ENERGY  Geothermal Energy Project Receives US$ 11.5 Million Grant Read More * Client

AGORACOM Launches Graphite Stocks Blog

Top Stories

  • FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc. Read More   |   *SPONSOR

  • LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMK) Paul Gill Discusses Exploration Initiative with James West of Midas Letter Read More   |   *SPONSOR
  • GRAPHITE DEMAND Seen Surging from Fuel Cells, Nuclear Reactors, Graphene Read More

 

 

Message: Cramer: to email or not to email

Img_1605_2
Rank: [?]
Treasurer
Points: [?]
352
Rating: [?]
Votes: 38 Score: 3.4
  • Currently 3.4/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: Cramer: to email or not to email//leaning to the no side

posted on Mar 21, 08 03:38PM
This is almost an impossible situation to forsee from my position. I agree all your pros and cons. I don't know how powerful a sell order by Cramer would be followed by his sheep. If he truly does his DD on all of NOT's  holdings, drill data, geo reports, etc then its hard to imagine how he would turn against NOT and the McF area play. BUT that's a biased opinion based on all the great inputs on this board over many months of in-depth DD and often brilliant analyses by very experienced and knowledgeable members (my thanx to them all). I do believe that the ONLY reason FNC is where it is today in one man whose name starts with K. So with that in mind, I can't deny that Cramer may result in an enhanced SP, as long as he is on side as you rightly state. If not, how much can he hurt NOT's SP is the real question ?

New Message

Please login to post a reply