High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - WEDNESDAY MAY 30TH, 2012

GOLDEN HOPE MINES (TSXV:GNH) Confirms High Grade Intersection of 64.1 g/t Au (Gold) over 1m Read More 

  • The screen metallic analysis returned 82 g/t Au for an average grade of 93.5 g/t Au.
  • Two additional fire assays on the original pulp done prior to the screen metallic analyses returned 0.22 g/t Au and 0.12 g/t Au for an average fire assay grade of 0.41 g/t Au. The weighted average of all the fire assays and screen metallic assays from this 1-metre section in hole BD2011-184 is 64.1 g/t Au.

Sonomax® eers™ Custom Earbuds Announces Sponsorship of MUTEK 2012

CONTINENTAL ENERGY  Geothermal Energy Project Receives US$ 11.5 Million Grant Read More * Client

AGORACOM Launches Graphite Stocks Blog

Top Stories

  • FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc. Read More   |   *SPONSOR

  • LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMK) Paul Gill Discusses Exploration Initiative with James West of Midas Letter Read More   |   *SPONSOR
  • GRAPHITE DEMAND Seen Surging from Fuel Cells, Nuclear Reactors, Graphene Read More

 

 

Message: Many here appear not to undertsand the offer...

Beckham_profile
Rank: [?]
Treasurer
Points: [?]
746
Rating: [?]
Votes: 68 Score: 3.5
  • Currently 3.6/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: Many here appear not to undertsand the offer...

posted on Oct 07, 09 11:50AM

Sambone, you wrote:

.....Why would I, as a shareholder of FWR, consider this great 'gift' of NOT shares. What would I then have? I would have lost the opportunity to see Mac take FWR to it's logical conclusion...a sale to a major for 'decent' money! Mac is the one I trust here....NOT Wes and his band of merry suits. NOT has been shady ever since the proxy vote. I don't trust the BOD of NOT, and since they brought in Wes, I don't really trust him yet...maybe in time. Do you trust them to give you full value for your NOT shares down the road?....or will there be dilution and cheap options for insiders, like the mess at AUR. And yes, I hold both NOT and FWR.

.....when Mac & Co say "Okay, it's a good deal", that's when I'll consider selling, trading, consolidating, blending.....

IMO, I believe your above statements are correct. I too have both FWR and NOT shares and I prefer to see FULL value for BOTH, and not one taken out for a fraction of what it is worth by the other.

EE

New Message

Please login to post a reply