High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - FRIDAY MAY 25TH, 2012

FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc.

  • Aim to develop and manufacture the best technology graphite in the world
  • Additional shareholder value will come from investment in commercialized graphene through joint venture partner, Grafoid Inc.

Read More   |   *SPONSOR

INTERNATIONAL PBX VENTURES (TSX:PBX) Signs Copaquire Joint Venture Option Agreement - $90M Potential Payment Read More

AGORACOM Maintenance Alert: Friday Evening Downtime for About an Hour Read More

LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMR) Graphite and Zinc Price Outlook is Favourable Through 2013  Read More   |   *SPONSOR

 

 

Message: Bad Timing

Generic_profile
Rank: [?]
President
Points: [?]
13659
Rating: [?]
Votes: 240 Score: 3.5
  • Currently 3.6/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: Bad Timing (or Opportune Timing ?)

in response to Re: Bad Timing by colombo10
posted on Oct 29, 09 09:50PM

Columbo, your posts touched on a good point which is worth some elaboration. A junior-for-junior share exchange is inherently weak, involving no cash or near cash. Unless of course the deal was "cooked" , that is, pre-agreed. That is obviously not the case here. FWR seems to have a very co-operative arrangement with CLF. There is no way CLF could maintain its strategic interest holding in the combined company. Simple math. Nor does CLF hold a strategic interest in NOT currently, because it would have been disclosed. NOT knows all this, so perhaps the bid is simply intended to force CLF's hand. Were NOT to be outbid by CLF here, it would not be a bad thing for NOT overall, as it would force any other interested major to move its plans forward , creating earlier liquidity for NOT's immense holdings. NOT's BoD are money guys, and have zero emotional attachment to the property. If the NOT Cr can be turned into an income stream earlier than otherwise, NOT might be able to realize its true potential in all minerals much earlier with less dilution . However , the gauntlet has clearly been thrown down to CLF, since CLF will lose its strategic holding in FWR (and the RoF) if the bid succeeds. The reason I now do not believe NOT's bid is supported by a major is because there is no money or highly liquid shares involved. So, I think it comes down to a CLF/NOT contest. Likely, everyone wins !

New Message

Please login to post a reply