High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - FRIDAY MAY 25TH, 2012

FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc.

  • Aim to develop and manufacture the best technology graphite in the world
  • Additional shareholder value will come from investment in commercialized graphene through joint venture partner, Grafoid Inc.

Read More   |   *SPONSOR

INTERNATIONAL PBX VENTURES (TSX:PBX) Signs Copaquire Joint Venture Option Agreement - $90M Potential Payment Read More

AGORACOM Maintenance Alert: Friday Evening Downtime for About an Hour Read More

LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMR) Graphite and Zinc Price Outlook is Favourable Through 2013  Read More   |   *SPONSOR

 

 

Message: Understanding The Freewest Mentality

Generic_profile
Rank: [?]
President
Points: [?]
13659
Rating: [?]
Votes: 240 Score: 3.5
  • Currently 3.6/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: Understanding The Freewest Mentality -Nobody is Getting Ripped Off

posted on Nov 05, 09 03:55PM

No where in my post did I state or suggest that FWR shareholders are getting ripped off. I actually have great confidence in all the managements to maximize shareholder values through these or other transactions. However, just as NOT holders think their shares are worth well above market, so would most FWR holders. More importantly, you as an investor should be focussed on what happenings are going ultimately to bring a major into the play, not on something you (and I) are incapable of valuing even relatively. For me, this proposed transaction does not add value in total in that I do not see the whole being worth more than the sum of the parts at this point, simply creating a different risk profile. As far as bringing a major into the play, it appears FWR may be closer than NOT. So, I am happy either way, but understand those FWR shareholders who see a better future without NOT, especially given the existing CLF relationship.

New Message

Please login to post a reply