High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - FRIDAY MAY 25TH, 2012

FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc.

  • Aim to develop and manufacture the best technology graphite in the world
  • Additional shareholder value will come from investment in commercialized graphene through joint venture partner, Grafoid Inc.

Read More   |   *SPONSOR

INTERNATIONAL PBX VENTURES (TSX:PBX) Signs Copaquire Joint Venture Option Agreement - $90M Potential Payment Read More

AGORACOM Maintenance Alert: Friday Evening Downtime for About an Hour Read More

LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMR) Graphite and Zinc Price Outlook is Favourable Through 2013  Read More   |   *SPONSOR

 

 

Message: News Release difference NOT-FWR

Generic_profile
Rank: [?]
President
Points: [?]
25119
Rating: [?]
Votes: 303 Score: 3.3
  • Currently 3.4/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

News Release difference NOT-FWR

posted on Nov 06, 09 02:01AM

The FWR Black Thor news release mentions hundreds of thousands of ounces of platinum and palladium. It sounds impressive does it not?
Forget about the word 'potential' in the release for the purposes of this post.

I often use an old annology:
The planet's oceans ( I mean the actual sea water ) have a huge content of gold, Yes gold, but no one is extracting it.
Why not?
Because despite it's huge content it is not practical because it is too thinly dispersed.

Similarly is with the PM deposit in Black Thor. The concentrations are too thin to be practical with current metal prices. For it to be economically viable those metal prices should be about double to triple present ones. Hence that part of the deposit is merely an academic or propaganda exercise for now and not a resource as such.
So why mention it?
Let me first compare to the Triple-J deposit of NOT.

About 44 holes drilled? but only four reported in the recent 'Discovery' announcement.

It appears that Noront used a one gram per ton limit for the mention of the resource.
Most of the remaining 40 or so holes in 3-J had similar concentrations of PM to FWR's release but Noront chose not to make an issue of them because the concentrations were border line or below the one gram limit.
Had Noront used the same approach to their drill holes they probably would have harped about all 44 holes.

So getting back, FWR advertizes half gram per ton PMs while NOT does not consider anything below a gram as PR worthy material.
So why the difference and now?
Why present this concept to the shareholders?

I leave that to you the readers of this forum to answer that for yourself, I have said enough. Ed.

New Message

Please login to post a reply