High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"

NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)

Hub Home

> Log In

Demo Video
Private Messages
Edit My Profile
View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - WEDNESDAY MAY 30TH, 2012

GOLDEN HOPE MINES (TSXV:GNH) Confirms High Grade Intersection of 64.1 g/t Au (Gold) over 1m Read More

The screen metallic analysis returned 82 g/t Au for an average grade of 93.5 g/t Au.
Two additional fire assays on the original pulp done prior to the screen metallic analyses returned 0.22 g/t Au and 0.12 g/t Au for an average fire assay grade of 0.41 g/t Au. The weighted average of all the fire assays and screen metallic assays from this 1-metre section in hole BD2011-184 is 64.1 g/t Au.

Sonomax® eers™ Custom Earbuds Announces Sponsorship of MUTEK 2012

Mutek provides an essential platform for 150 performers to showcase forward-thinking electronic music programming and new media to more than 25,000 attendees
Read Full Press Release; Read Why Sonomax?
Jump Into Active Discussion Forum
*Sponsor*

CONTINENTAL ENERGY Geothermal Energy Project Receives US$ 11.5 Million Grant Read More * Client

AGORACOM Launches Graphite Stocks Blog

Message: Please explain

Reply New Message

« Prev Message Back To Forum Go to Threaded View Next Message »

Edgy

Rank: [?]

President

Points: [?]

25140

Rating: [?]

Votes: 303 Score: 3.3

Currently 3.4/5 Stars.

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: Please explain - imo.

in response to Please explain by IAMSUDBURY

posted on Nov 11, 09 04:19PM

Do not get hung up on this disclosure, it does not mean anything profound. If anything it is meant to give the impression of such. If it was anything profound they would at least name the party involved, i.e. if you were a large FWR holder and sitting on the fence regarding tendering would you not want to know who it was? It would be to FWR's benefit to disclose the name.

Disclosures are signed all the time and often they have a time limit. No one wants to be on the hook forever. Dec.1 means nothing.

Because it is only to the end of the month, I conclude that it is a fund that is considering investing in one or both, OR one of those attending the luncheon on friday.

If I had deep $ pockets I would also want the benefit of a privileged disclosure.

Reply New Message

« Prev Message Back To Forum Go to Threaded View Next Message »