High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - FRIDAY MAY 25TH, 2012

FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc.

  • Aim to develop and manufacture the best technology graphite in the world
  • Additional shareholder value will come from investment in commercialized graphene through joint venture partner, Grafoid Inc.

Read More   |   *SPONSOR

INTERNATIONAL PBX VENTURES (TSX:PBX) Signs Copaquire Joint Venture Option Agreement - $90M Potential Payment Read More

AGORACOM Maintenance Alert: Friday Evening Downtime for About an Hour Read More

LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMR) Graphite and Zinc Price Outlook is Favourable Through 2013  Read More   |   *SPONSOR

 

 

Message: I just hate...

Hoover colour smaller
Rank: [?]
President
Points: [?]
44962
Rating: [?]
Votes: 549 Score: 3.9
  • Currently 4.0/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: I just hate...

in response to I just hate... by notster
posted on Nov 13, 09 07:31AM

Nice musings there, Rob.

As to the 25% cut-off grade for chromite, I don't understand it. Noront's April shareholder's luncheon presentation gave an example of 28% chromite being upgraded to a 53% concentrate (those numbers off the top of my pre-coffee brain) with simple gravity separation. The market may have a cut-off for concentrates, but I don't perceive a practical one in mining ore, unless you're dealing with a disseminated bed inercalated with broad bands of host rock. The overall grade would be lower than 25% for that, though. And that is an economic cut-off, and economics of mining and recovery are stages of analysis that none of us have any information about, at the present time.

I have to conclude that we're seeing more smoke and mirrors. A cut-off was not the reason the estimated resource shrank, IMHO. It may account for the 50-60 million tonne variability, but not the fact that the total tonnage is in that range in the first place.

Lar

New Message

Please login to post a reply