High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"

NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)

Hub Home

> Log In

Demo Video
Private Messages
Edit My Profile
View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - WEDNESDAY MAY 30TH, 2012

GOLDEN HOPE MINES (TSXV:GNH) Confirms High Grade Intersection of 64.1 g/t Au (Gold) over 1m Read More

The screen metallic analysis returned 82 g/t Au for an average grade of 93.5 g/t Au.
Two additional fire assays on the original pulp done prior to the screen metallic analyses returned 0.22 g/t Au and 0.12 g/t Au for an average fire assay grade of 0.41 g/t Au. The weighted average of all the fire assays and screen metallic assays from this 1-metre section in hole BD2011-184 is 64.1 g/t Au.

Sonomax® eers™ Custom Earbuds Announces Sponsorship of MUTEK 2012

Mutek provides an essential platform for 150 performers to showcase forward-thinking electronic music programming and new media to more than 25,000 attendees
Read Full Press Release; Read Why Sonomax?
Jump Into Active Discussion Forum
*Sponsor*

CONTINENTAL ENERGY Geothermal Energy Project Receives US$ 11.5 Million Grant Read More * Client

AGORACOM Launches Graphite Stocks Blog

Message: Idle Speculation

Reply New Message

« Prev Message Back To Forum Go to Threaded View Next Message »

rapidrob

Rank: [?]

President

Points: [?]

13659

Rating: [?]

Votes: 240 Score: 3.5

Currently 3.6/5 Stars.

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: Idle Speculation Zoo loo (A-1)

in response to Re: Idle Speculation Zoo loo (A-1) by oiramoric

posted on Nov 16, 09 08:24AM

There is a fourth possibility. That is people like FWR and NOT but each for quite different reasons. As a result, they may feel the present value of FWR alone is higher than the present value of the exchange offer. Personally, I love NOT for the much longer term, but believe FWR can be developed earlier. As well there are potentially different long term owners for each. Additionally, many may feel very leerie about how the funds will treat retail post merger. The last flow through was obviously never offered to retail.

Many FWR/NOT shareholders are diversified and wish to remain that way. As an aside, many will also predict a short term but potentially significant price drop in NOT post merger as many liquidate some or all of their newly acquired NOT shares or simply rebalance their portfolios. It is never black and white.

Reply New Message

« Prev Message Back To Forum Go to Threaded View Next Message »