High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire"
NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - WEDNESDAY MAY 30TH, 2012

GOLDEN HOPE MINES (TSXV:GNH) Confirms High Grade Intersection of 64.1 g/t Au (Gold) over 1m Read More 

  • The screen metallic analysis returned 82 g/t Au for an average grade of 93.5 g/t Au.
  • Two additional fire assays on the original pulp done prior to the screen metallic analyses returned 0.22 g/t Au and 0.12 g/t Au for an average fire assay grade of 0.41 g/t Au. The weighted average of all the fire assays and screen metallic assays from this 1-metre section in hole BD2011-184 is 64.1 g/t Au.

Sonomax® eers™ Custom Earbuds Announces Sponsorship of MUTEK 2012

CONTINENTAL ENERGY  Geothermal Energy Project Receives US$ 11.5 Million Grant Read More * Client

AGORACOM Launches Graphite Stocks Blog

Top Stories

  • FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc. Read More   |   *SPONSOR

  • LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMK) Paul Gill Discusses Exploration Initiative with James West of Midas Letter Read More   |   *SPONSOR
  • GRAPHITE DEMAND Seen Surging from Fuel Cells, Nuclear Reactors, Graphene Read More

 

 

Message: Evaluating FWR/NOT

P1000968
Rank: [?]
President
Points: [?]
20809
Rating: [?]
Votes: 344 Score: 3.7
  • Currently 3.8/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Evaluating FWR/NOT

posted on Nov 22, 09 01:24PM

There has been so much discussion on these forums in the last month about how either FWR or NOT is worth so much more or so much less, and why it is so much better to stick with one as opposed to the other, that I thought I would portray a few facts. I have made several statements in the past about how to evaluate either of these plays, and there have been opposing views expressed, but what I am discussing here is factual history.

Let's assume that someone possessed 1mill shares of FWR when the offer from not was originally aired.

It was possible to trade these shares at an average SP of .5165/ share, for a net of $516,000 dollars.

If that individual wanted to remove their original investment going forward, they could have set aside $193,000, and used the remaining $323,000 to purchase 200,000 shares of NOT at an average of 1.615.

That 200,000 shares would now be worth $458,000. When this is added to the $193,000 that was set aside. their total holding would now be $651,000.

OR; They could have been content to hold things as they were and their total holding would now be $550,000.

Best regards

K

New Message

Please login to post a reply