.... I am fully capable of keeping things clean. You must be witnessing on the Stockhouse forum how intelligent the discussion is over there. I am not suggesting that I am more intelligent than anybody who frequents these forums but I do try to keep things focused on the program. My only fault is being a little colourful in my posts ... especially when dealing with the riff raff.
In recent days/weeks I had brought out a question regarding screen sizes and it all began when PGD halted their stock. When I posted that they had halted ... most everybody who responded stated that PGD knew how to give news while Sola management was failing us. Well .. the trap was set ... I came to show how these bellyachers didn't have a clue as to what the content of the PGD news actually meant. Well ... then they said it wasn't the content .. it was the level of detail. My response ... if the detailed content is misunderstood or not understood at all then what's the point. Further to this I pointed out how Will Purcells had a comment from Friedland agreeing the results showed only a moderate diamondiferous showing if even that.
Nobody answered my question as to what the results actually meant other than Eric Friedland himself ... who I might add ... halted the stock to announce those so-so results.
Sola management is a little more together in my opinion.
I have showed this thread the numbers from the group of companies releasing results so far ... I realize the tables didn't show up the way I wanted but hopefully you can reference tham anyway. I ask ... do you guys understand what the announcements were actually stating and do you see how different our approach to the game is currently?
If Solas experienced ... ground level group ... thought the micro evaluation was the best route to go prior to any bulk consideration ... they wouldn't have upsized the plant when they did ... they wouldn't have started bulking before the drill results were in ... period.
Sola took this pattern of progression for a reason. I have placed my money based on the circumstances and the evidence supporting the circumstances. I don't worry about the share price at current levels.
I bought 10,000 more at $0.29 Friday ... looks like Pfaff got the ones at $0.255 ... my only regret is ... well ... I don't have any !!!
Afew weeks ago I brought up the 'sample site' location ... nobody over there commented to my questions ... why ... they have no clue how the boyz knew there was kimberlite over there ... I brought it up to highlight that the boyz know plenty more than we do.
You see .. if the boyz simply wanted to test the plant ... one would think they do it in one of the pits that they had previously excavated. Well ... I showed everybody how there was no pit recorded at that location ... so why did they test the plant over there? Maybe ... if they ran the test in the exposed pits it might of been considered production. Maybe they cleverly/purposely took the test up there just to see what they might find based on the geophysics and to their pleasant surprise ... they hit kimberlite. Well ... since this wasn't expected .. they got to run the test on that material and sure as the night will come ... they would have found something sitting in the jigs after that test run. I posted the picture of them looking very intently into Jig 2 ... they weren't looking for squirrels.
News is good ... details are great ... however ... it is only as good as those who are interpreting it. My latest launch on LTTL was only to highlight why a character like him has no business calling down Sola management for clarity issues when in all honesty ... he could be right on-site and he still wouldn't understand what he was looking at. The Dianor example prooved that point explicitly.
LTTL has supposedly been in both SL and DOR for a couple years yet he didn't understand what a ramp with dimensions of hundreds of metres long by 4mtr and 4mtr ... height ... length ... was an underground tunnel. This guy frequents both threads on the other forum and the topic has been discussed many times on the Dianor board yet when the company puts out a very comprehensive update describing the next stage in the program ... LTTL asks the board for clarity on the ramp ... he asks ... what does the height and width mean. So you can see that the people who criticize the company the most about clarity are the ones who wouldn't get it even if clarity was poking them in the face.
I hope I didn't cross any Agoracom line right there.
Anyway Molymaiden ... if the discussion over here is worth the effort ... I'm all in.
I have my eye on the other forum and it's hilarious what is going on over there. Same old same old.
Some of those folks figured I have multiple handles ... not the case and I challenge them to contact that company to verify the addresses of every handle they think I have ... I can do the same for them ... lets see if that company can validate each and every suspect.
Of course having different E-mails is easy enough ... putting in phony information ... well ... thats quite simple as well ... does that company even verify the info before they setup an account. Do they have strict protocol on how membership is approved ... well ... maybe my suggestion wouldn't bare any fruit anyway.
Ahh well ... if people were tuned in .. it is very easy to pick up on individual human characteristics ... we all are unique ... I could pick up quite readily ... certain aspects of an individuals posting habits and be able to suggest that the person in question has very unique characteristics that match the characteristics of another.
I might not be right every time ... but ... nine times out of ten ... I could pick it out. Of course this can't be done over a short period of time .. the patterns have to be followed for enough time that coincidence is ruled out.
If I was to go through my notes ... I could easily show you what I mean. The evidence comes from both public and private correspondance. I won't go there ... private is private ... I always keep it that way.
Anyway ... enough about that stuff .. let's get some comments on micro vs. macro and what diamond curves actually suggest in relation to Santana or any of the others.
