Welcome to the TTM Resources Stock Hub
(Edit this Message from the "Fast Facts" Section)
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE .... TUESDAY FEBRUARY 14TH

UPDATE 1:30PM

Graphite is the Emerging Investment Story of 2012

Graphite Investment Conference Vancouver

Hotel Vancouver | BC BALLROOM | 2-4 PM | February 23, 2012 - Attendance is free

Find out more today!

Breaking News ....

Strike Graphite Corp. (TSXV:SRK) Acquires Wagon Graphite Project in Quebec in Vicinity of Timcal's Lac des Iles Graphite Mine *CLIENT Read More  |  Profile

Strike Graphite goes "Beyond the Press Release"

McLaren Resources (CNSX:MCL) Drills 7.0 Grams Gold Over 7.4 Metres at the TimGinn Property Located Adjacent to the Hollinger Mine *CLIENT* Read More | Watch Beyond the Press Release

 AGORACOM Launches GraphiteStocksBlog.com

We're proud to announce the launch of GraphiteStocksBlog.com a website dedicated to the needs of investors and companies in the fast growing Graphite industry.

INAUGURAL GRAPHITE SPONSORS

 

 

Message: a case for Moly Mines ???

Generic_profile
Rank: [?]
Mail Room
Points: [?]
95
Rating: [?]
Votes: 1 Score: 5.0
  • Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

Re: a case for Moly Mines ???

posted on Nov 04, 08 07:44AM

Traderdad, before i thought you were stippy and even more so now. can't remember now why but i do recall a convo on the stockhouse board where i think you forgot which handle you were under (not going to argue this as this is only an opinion).

TTM has a pure moly resource, MOL will have to pay to extract the moly from the copper. Just an extra cost. Yes Mol has similar numbers as per resources, however TTM is still exploring and extending its deposit and MOL is not. I am also pretty sure we have a higher grade of cutoff (i think MOL is .02 and TTM is .05). Yes MOL is technically farther along but i prefer TTM.

Also the way you word things reminds me of the way the presidential race has explained what either party stands for. You need to be careful when you say "Full Permits in Place". Yes they are in place but for only the time being. They will still need the following permits:

cut and past out of the MOL NI-43101.

Mining

The Spinifex Ridge Project is required to comply with a number of State and Commonwealth

legislation prior to commencement of mining operations. These are discussed below.

A. State Government Legislation

State legislation relevant to the proposal includes:

Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972;

Agriculture and Related Resources Protection Act 1976;

Bush Fires Act 1954;

Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act);

Environmental Protection Amendment Act 2003;

Explosives and Dangerous Goods Act 1961;

Dangerous Goods (Transport) Act 1998;

Land Administration (Amendments) Act 1997;

Local Government Act 1995;

Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914;

Town Planning & Development Act 1928;

Wildlife Conservation Act 1950-1979;

Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994

Occupational Safety & Health Act 1984; and

Mining Act 1978.

The EP Act is the principal statute relevant to environmental protection in Western Australia. The EP

Act makes provision for the prevention, control and abatement of pollution and for the conservation,

SRK Consulting

Spinifex Ridge BFS NI43-101 Resource Report Page 12

SR Mineral Resource Reserve Report NI43-101 TSX 301007 Final.doc

October, 2007

preservation, protection, enhancement and management of the environment. It also provides for the

control and licensing of potentially polluting activities and is the Act under which the State’s

environmental assessment process operates.

It has been determined by the EPA that the Spinifex Ridge Project requires a formal level of

environmental assessment at the level of Public Environmental Review. (PER)

The Project has also been deemed as a “complex project” by the Office of Development Approvals

Coordination and as such is progressing concurrently through the Integrated Project Approvals

System process. Approvals that do not relate directly to environmental issues eg Shire and DOH

approvals, will be progressed concurrently with environmental approvals.

B. Federal Government Legislation

Under the EPBC Act, an action requires approval from the Federal Minister for the Environment and

Heritage if the action has, will have, or is likely to have, a significant impact on a matter of National

environmental significance. The factors currently defined as matters of National environmental

significance under the EPBC Act include:

World Heritage properties;

National Heritage Places;

Ramsar wetlands of international importance;

listed threatened species and communities;

migratory species protected under international agreements;

nuclear actions; and

the Commonwealth marine environment.

New Message

Please login to post a reply

AGORACOM Quick Tips

Potential Near-Term Gold Producer; Recent Bonanza Grades ... Learn More!
Watch
Today's Show
in 00:00:000

President's D.D.

Latest presentation from TTM... now there is a sizeable measured resource! read more

Hub Leaders