LOL. EDIG did prevail and never contested the fact that they received $80K from digEcor for the batteries which digEcor refused to accept.

From Doc 414: "Over the course of the three-years-plus litigation, e.Digital systematically defeated claim after claim, until only three issues remained for trial. On September 10, 2009, the Court issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, deciding all of the trial issues in e.Digital’s favor and completely eliminating the longstanding legal threat against e.Digital. digEcor’s sole recovery in the case was an award of $80,000 to return the money it paid for a set of batteries that e.Digital had been unable to deliver and digEcor refused to accept— an issue which e.Digital did not actively dispute."

-------

And here is the Clerk's Amended Judgment seen in Doc 405:

CLERK'S AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Digecor against E Digital for $80,000 for the purchase price of batteries; in favor of E Digital against Digecor on the remaining claims which are dismissed with prejudice signed by Louise York, Chief Deputy Clerk. (las) (Entered: 10/16/2009)

-------

BOW wants people to think he won just because the judge awarded him the $80K which EDIG agreed to pay from the outset. He's trying to save face with his customers, his employees, and probably even his family. EDIG had the money saved explicitly for the purpose of repaying digEcor. In sync now? If not, I'd suggest some DD to get acquainted with your investment. You did say you own EDIG right?