Free
Message: Would you do this for an iPhone?
June 28, 2011.

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

MARCIA S. KRIEGER, District Judge

[1] A second patent, United States Patent 5,742,737, is also at issue in this case, but, for the reasons explained herein, the Court need not reach the claims in that patent.

------------------------------------------------------

From , August ,22 , 2013 press release

, the ruling has no apparent impact on the Company's assertions of patent infringement against the defendants under the Company's US Patent No. 5,742,737, and US Patent No. 5,842,170 which are also asserted in the cases.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply