to answer, filed by us:

(PS only one federal case including dropcam, available to see, edig sued dropcam)

below, partial: filed yesterday by edig, :

Counsel for the Defendant has indicated that the Defendant needs additional

time to review the Complaint in this matter and to prepare a response to the

Complaint. Time is also needed for the parties to consider and discuss the

possibility of an early resolution of this matter. If a resolution can be reached in

this matter, most likely such a resolution would be a global resolution that would

resolve this case in its entirety as to all the parties.

With the above in mind, Plaintiff seeks an extension of time for Defendant

to respond to the Complaint not for delay, but to, among other things, permit the

parties an opportunity to resolve Plaintiff’s claims without the need for further

litigation.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully request that Defendant be provided an

extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint until September

8, 2014 or whatever date the Court deems just and reasonable under the

circumstances. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.2, Plaintiff will separately submit a

Proposed Order granting the relief requested.

Dated: July 21, 2014

HANDAL & ASSOCIATES