Message: e.Digital Corporation v. Intel Corporation - ** Notice Of Settlement **
"After all the patent citations they did with the 108 ..."
"I don't think this will be a little one"
??
* Cited by examiner
Those Intel patent issues were patented prior to 108, they were cited by the 108 examiner for the prosecution of 108....as prior art.
The importance of that material posted(from GOOGLE), was regarding the current USPTO inter parties review and Intel motion to stay their case pending that review. The material establishishes that the Intel patents were utilized in the prosecution of the 108 patent...with that, why would Intel now challange the 108 patent with that history as part of the prosecution? IMO, Intels 292 page USPTO challange is nothing more than a time killer.
The now current status of all that mess....
November 17, 2014.
The Court vacates the November 17, 2014 hearing regarding Defendant’s motion
to stay pending inter partes review. (Doc. No. 40.) Accordingly, Plaintiff does not
- 1 -
need to file an opposition to this motion until a new hearing date is scheduled. See
Civ. L.R. 7.1(e)(2).
========
It's over, but it's not over fully...yet
Now we see what the remaining defendants do.
doni
12 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply