Free
Message: Pacer: e.Digital Corporation v. SanDisk; Pantech; Woodman Labs (GoPro)

e.Digital Corporation v. SanDisk Corporation

  • Assigned to: Judge Dana M. Sabraw
  • Referred to: Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo
  • Related Case: 3:12−cv−02543−DMS−WVG
  • Cause: 35:271 Patent Infringement

03/06/2015 67 STATUS REPORT Joint Statement Requested By The Court Re: Status Of Litigation After Appeal by e.Digital Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Chalk, Pamela) (Entered: 03/06/2015)

Case Nos.

  • 12cv2899-DMS (WVG)
  • 13cv0023-DMS (WVG)
  • 12cv-2698-DMS (WVG)

JOINT STATEMENT REQUESTED BY THE COURT RE: STATUS OF LITIGATION AFTER APPEAL Date: March 20, 2015 Time: 10:30 a.m. Judge: Judge Dana M. Sabraw Assigned to the Honorable Judge Dana M. Sabraw Courtroom 13A (Annex)

  1. Case No.: 3:12-cv-02698-DMS-WVG, e.Digital Corporation v. SanDisk Corporation (Dkt #63);
  2. Case No.: 3:12-cv-02899-DMS-WVG, e.Digital Corporation v Woodman Labs, Inc. et al. (Dkt #80);
  3. Case No.: 3:13-cv-00023-DMS-WVG, e.Digital Corporation v. Pantech Wireless, Inc. et al. (Dkt #54)

In light of the fact that a mandate has issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the Woodman Labs and Pantech cases, this Court ordered the parties to provide a joint statement concerning the status of litigation given that a mandate has been issued. A status hearing concerning the same has been set by the Court for March 20, 2015 at 10:30 a.m.

This joint statement is hereby submitted pursuant to the Court’s order. The Defendants in each of the above-listed cases are collectively referred to as the “Defendants.” The Plaintiff in each of the above-listed cases, e.Digital Corporation, is referred to herein as “Plaintiff.” Plaintiff and the Defendants are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”

Document 67: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx9NLDCScshnU2NWeTJ0LUVQQkE/view?usp=sharing

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply