Free
Message: Pacer: e.Digital Corporation v. ArcSoft - order denying motion to stay

Doni I get your "Drift" spot on this is about getting a favorable "Markman and IPR" early in the process with Goliath. Getting the word out about the Technology will occur when that happens. All other Companies in this technology space are waiting and watching. Handle's team IMHO were involved in the Patents during the beginning of them being issued by the PTO. Litigation of them for his team is slightly weighted in our favor. If you are a knowledgeable builder of the foundations strength you more-or-less the best to predict probability of success through litigation. Having the perspective to have the Inventor, CEO, Attorney's available at the time of disputes disapates over time. Thus the importance of litigation early rather than later. The best "Witnesses " are the people themselves. No other persons can accurately tell your story of intent of ideas than you in civil litigation. IPR is a different animal that I am still waiting to learn regarding the history of the patents patentability. Today is Sunday Football will the best Teams Win? NOT

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply