Free
Message: Word filter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff(s) e.DIGITAL  v. Defendant(s)Utility Associates, Inc. CASE No C STIPULATION AND  ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

 

STIPULATION AND  ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS 

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: ˆ Mediation  (ADR L.R. 6) ˆ

 

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ˆ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ˆ other requested deadline: Date: Date: Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant

Date: Date: Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant ˆ IT IS SO ORDERED ˆ IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. February 21, 2017 X e.Digital Corporation Utility Associates, Inc. 16-06945-JST ■ ■ February 15, 2017 /s/ Gabriel G. Hedrick Attorney for Plaintiff, Karen Boyd ,Attorney for Defendant

 

ˆ IT IS SO ORDERED ˆ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE  L.R. 3-5. February 21, 2017 X

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply