I personally don't read D&D's comments as "there is no contract", just that all this makes little sense.

If it's such a "great" thing for both companies how come one cannot find anything pertaining to the ClearCalm product on Scott's website? How come Grayling isn't blowing the trumpets of glowing success?

If it's an issue of non-disclosure within the agreement, why not come right out and remove all doubt from investor's minds and just say that. And on that note, whatever could it be that they don't want the public to be aware of... this in itself bleeds suspicion in my mind... what do they have to hide?

My point was simply this, Grayling was desperate to get something, anything to happen... case in point, hiring MEC (an online promotional company) is an indication of desperation in my opinion. Scott smelled this weakness and took advantage by throwing the dog a bone in hopes they'll eventually walk away with the meat. Grayling made a product to specifically fit into Scott's masks, talk about putting all your eggs in one basket... if I was at Scott I would surely have taken advantage of this fact.

I phoned Scott and there is a Tom Korb to which I left a message with... let's see if he gets back to me and if he has anything to say.

cheers!

P.S. In a statement of fairness, maybe Scott needed time to make some changes to the labeling on the product to brand it as a "Scott" product as opposed to a Grayling/ClearCalm brand... but hardly something to be secretive about.