This may have been discussed previously and if it has been determined that this is of little significance, please advise.

Has anyone taken the time to read Chuck Moore's website, specifically as it applies to his legal battle with TPL over ownership? I have copied part of what he posted below (after the link to his website). I suggest that you also read the stipulated final judgement.

I have researched the press releases of TPL regarding MMP licensing activity. Through Sept. 16 of this year, every prior license announcement says that the MMP is jointly owned by TPL and Patriot. Beginning with the Oct. 5 announcement "Wave of MMP" there is no longer any reference to joint ownership. However, in PTSC's announcements the joint ownership language is still there. My question is this: Did Carlton Johnson sign a document that clouds ownership of the MMP for PTSC? Could this have anything to do with the change of ownership language in TPL's announcments?

From Chuck Moore: http://colorforth.com/PTO.htm I recently learned of this court document: The Stipulated Final Judgment of Patriot's inventorship suit. Note the phrase "TPL is at least co-owner of the [patents]" in paragraph 5. Somehow that became an issue to be adjudged. Without my knowledge. It added the imprimatur of a judge's ruling to Leckrone's claim.

The vagueness of the phrase has several interpretations:

• TPL is co-owner with me (presumably 45%/55%) of my 50%
• TPL is co-owner with Patriot - 50%/50%
• TPL has more than 45% share with me (the qualifier "at least")
• TPL has more than 50% share with Patriot

Questions abound:

• Why did Carl Johnson sign a document that clouds Patriot's title?
• Why did my lawyer, F. Eric Saunders, not sign?
• Is the judgment valid without his signature?
• Who decided to conceal the document from me?

I'm told the time to appeal this verdict has long passed. Clearly I'm looking like a complete fool for trusting Leckrone, Cook and Saunders to look out for my interest. But I hadn't a clue that they weren't. How closely must you monitor and control your lawyer?