That during the tutorial he would take into account

At the Tutorial, the parties shall be prepared to address the following procedural
history:
(a) A review of Judge Ward’s claim construction order(s);
(b) A review of the PTO’s reexaminations and the impact, if any, those proceedings
have on these cases;
(c) A review of the claims identified in Defendant HTC’s Motion for Summary
Judgment of Non-Infringement as significant in resolving the Motion.

This case was placed on hold for years because Acer et al were successful in having the USPTO re-examine the patents, the end result of which was a re-cert. My gut tells me they are toast...but as Ron reminds us all, we shall see.

I am hopeful