Lets have a look at a couple facts from Paul Grays report............2010.....now some may say I cherry picked the good information.........I challenenge you to find me the negative facts .... here is the link to make it a little easier .

http://steliasmines.com/wordpress2/wp-content/storage/Technical_Report_Files/Tesoro_technical_report.pdf

1.

Over limit assays for Au were

required and were run by Group G6Gr on the pulps of samples 314804, 314807, 314809-314815,

314817-314819, 314824-314825, 314838-314840 and 314842 as well as for all 10 Dynacor Pulp

samples. Group G6Gr is a metallic screening Fire Assay method utilizing a 30gm sample for high

grade >1 oz Au samples.

2.

Of the 40 rock (surface and underground) samples collected and analyzed by PDGGC during the

Property inspection, 24 were sampled at locations marked with St. Elias sample numbers. These

assays were then selected from the St. Elias database and correlated with PDGGC’s assay results

from ACME Labs. PDGGC’s assay values were normalized to a g/t Au based on the PDGGC

thresholds of analysis, e.g. the ACME analytical process G6Gr was taken as the most

representative analytical process of the three, then if G6Gr was unavailable 3B50 was utilized.

This process was deemed most effective as the G6Gr and 3B50 analytical processes use a larger

sample size with which to conduct the analyses (thereby decreasing the potential influence of the

nugget effect).

3. the fact that the assays are predominantly

biased higher from PDGGC independent sampling and assaying is indicative of St. Elias’

professional reporting of the assays from the Tesoro Project

these 3 statements have been copied and pasted ver batim from the 43-101 dated September 30, 2010