Since I have been invested in SLI we have not seen a single drop of success and the only thing that ever produced a rise in company value is now known to be smoke and mirrors rooted in lies ambiguity and innuendo.

I am mentioning the above to make a point...not as a point of discussion as history has shown this to be indisputable.

My point is this...

Where is the success and track record that allows our President to keep their position in the eyes of the BOD?

I challenge the entire world of SLI followers, the lovers and haters alike to scour the world of business and find me a President or CEO in any industry that has the same track-record of consistent failure, grown no "real" value in the company, burned through cash reserves while making no tangible progress, having no discernable plan nor even making tangible effort to steer the ship in a positive direction...and while their incompetence and performance is clear as day...they still holding their position and never have their performance questioned by those who are responsible for their hire...the BOD

I would love someone to come on this board and present a rational case justifying the BOD decision to keep OUR President in their position rather than replacing them.

...

This level of failure would get you immediately escorted out of the Teamsters Union...which normally you have to die to be removed. How on earth can someone so clearly incompetent remain in charge at SLI

David Copperfeild must be on the Advisory Board.

S.