Welcome To the WIN!!! St. Elias Mines HUB On AGORACOM

Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Free
Message: Sinister

Dear John,

You say;

"sculpin - yes, but Buenaventura didn't make an offer. Companies are always looking - but real interest? There is no evidence of that - just hearsay and rumour like you see on any other exploration stock bulletin board. How do you know Buenaventura asked to review the data? Did you hear that from the same management team you no longer believe anything they say?

Sometimes selling something for $100k rather than dumping millions to drill it with little probability of success is extremely prudent."

I hesitate to take the time to respond to your posts and similar ones that ask for proof of the things we say. We don,t say things on this forum that we can,t back up, however you guys seem to be persitent and consistent in asking for proof from us, when all you have to do is research it yourself.Look in the bolded print of the news release done by me, below, and interpret. Instead of taking your time of pestering investors here, it would be much better spent familiarizing yourself with the historic data. I know you have said that you are a new investor and that you have performed extensive DD, but I can assure you, that you have missed many things in the course of doing your DD. You are also contributing to clutter on the board, which would be much appreciated if you and sinster would ease off on the repetitive clutter, thank you.

You are underestimating the potential of the Cueva Blanca when you mention its sale in the last line of your post. Again, had you done your DD on that property, you could not have possibly come to the conclusion you have. I have been making valid,substantial and pertinent points in my posts, which seem that you are either intentionally ignoring or are oblivious to what is actually being said. But, your intelligence seems to be portrayed as high, so I am left with believing your actions are intended and for other causes than the display of innocence accompanying your posts.

You are blatantly insulting the intelligence of investors here, and insulting is against the Agoracom rules.

thank you

rick

April 30, 2012

Vancouver, B.C. April 30, 2012, Lori McClenahan, President, Intigold Mines Ltd. (IGD – TSX:V) and St. Elias Mines Ltd. (SLI – TSX:V) (collectively the “Companies”), announces today the following update and overview with respect to the Cueva Blanca Gold Property (the “Property”) located in northwest Peru. The Property is owned 100% by St. Elias Mines Ltd. Intigold Mines Ltd. has an option to acquire a 60% interest in the Property.

The Companies have initiated field studies in the Cueva Blanca area in preparation for diamond drilling. At this time, it is anticipated that very little field work will be required prior to mobilizing drilling equipment and crews to the site. The initial drilling targets include the Cruz vein, the Cruz breccia bodies as well as the Bi-Hg quartz manto zone. The economic targets at the property are gold and silver.

The Companies have recently been approached by Compania de Minas Buenaventura (NYSE-BVN) to conduct a review of the property. The Companies are taking this into consideration.

Cueva Blanca Property Agreement

Intigold acquired an option to earn a 60% carried interest in the Property, subject to a 1.5% net smelter return royalty (“NSR”), from St. Elias in consideration of Intigold making cash payments of $200,000 to St. Elias over a two-year period, issuing 1,000,000 common shares in the capital of Intigold to St. Elias and incurring $1.5-million in exploration expenditures on the Property over a three-year period.

In addition, Intigold has the right to purchase one-half of the 1.5% NSR from St. Elias for the sum of $1,500,000, thereby reducing the NSR payable from 1.5% to 0.75%.

Cueva Blanca Property

The Property covers approximately 5,000 hectares (50km2), and is located in the Lambayeque department in northwestern Peru, within the Northern Peru Miocene metallogenic belt. This belt is defined by a large number of world class gold and copper-gold deposits of similar age (5-25 million years). Giant gold deposits within this belt include Yanacocha, Lagunas Norte, and Pierina. Also of great importance are world-class Cu+/-Au porphyry deposits such as Rio Blanco, Canariaco, La Granja, Cerro Corona, Minas Conga-Galeno-Michiqillay, Magistral, and Antamina. The giant gold deposits and the Cu-Au porphyries often occur in clusters (e.g. Yanacocha-Conga-Galeno-Michiqillay). Discrete vein and breccia-hosted deposits of gold and polymetallic mineralization occur adjacent to some Cu porphyry deposits.

The Cueva Blanca property is bordered to the south and southeast by mineral concessions of Vale S.A. (NYSE: VALE). Barrick Gold (NYSE: ABX) holds extensive mineral concessions four kilometres to the north.

The Property lies within the northern member of a pair of profound east-west tectonic warps that cross northern Peru. These flexures are marked by an abrupt change in the direction of the regional geological trend from northwest to east-west. Within the southernmost of these tectonic features is the multi-million ounce Yanacocha gold mine and numerous Cu-Au porphyry deposits. Both the northern and southern structures are on the order of 60-80 km wide; they extend right across the Andes from the Pacific Ocean to the Amazon River Basin.

The locations of the giant Yanacocha gold mine and other gold deposits and Cu-Au porphyries of the Cajamarca district may be controlled or at least influenced by east to north-east structures within the large-scale southern tectonic flexure. The Cueva Blanca property, as well as, the Canariaco and Rio Blanco Cu-Au porphyries and gold prospects such as Las Huaquillas (Inca One) and Rio Tabaconas (Golden Alliance, GLL), appear to be with the northern tectonic flexure.

An important feature of the Cueva Blanca property is the Cruz gold/silver epithermal vein system. Some examples of exceptional classic epithermal deposits with geologic characteristics similar to the Cruz vein system are Kupol (Russia), El Penon (Chile), and Tayoltita, Guanajuato, and Pachuca (Mexico).

Exploration History

Cueva Blanca exploration history has followed the classic pattern: acquisition based on geologic reasoning; property-wide prospecting and subsequent discovery of precious metal showings; detailed surface exploration of mineralized zones; and initial diamond drilling. The historical results provide an indication of the potential of the Property and are relevant to continuing exploration.

The previously announced confirmation exploration work, conducted in 2011, consisting of sampling of outcrops and trenches at the Cruz Vein portion of the Property. Assay results indicate a weighted average grade of 2.84 g/t gold across an average width of 4.3 meters and along a strike length of 850 meters in the Cruz Vein system.

Historical exploration work on the Cruz vein system, which included 91 trenches and 18 drill holes totalling 1,860 metres, proved that the quartz veins consistently contain gold and silver and that the Cruz vein system is a classic epithermal gold-silver deposit. Historical results of gold assays from the Cruz vein drill program include 6.0 metres of 2.31 grams per tonne, 6.0 metres of 2.96 grams per tonne (including 1.75 metres of 7.45 grams per tonne), 1.5 metres of 22.68 grams per tonne, 9.5 metres of 8.09 grams per tonne (including 1.5 metres of 35.84 grams per tonne), 10.8 metres of 2.4 grams per tonne and 1.2 metres of 6.95 grams per tonne. The vein intersections contain virtually no sulphides. The vein system is open along strike to the southeast and northwest, and to depth. (Summary report, Sivertz, 1999.)

While the Companies have no reason to doubt the accuracy of the historical results, the existing data should not be relied upon until the Companies’ own exploration work confirms that the data meet National Instrument 43-101 standards for disclosure. Historical results and the work that generated them predate the enactment of National Instrument 43-101 and accordingly may not meet the requirements of that policy.

Qualified Person

The technical contents of this news release have been verified by, George Sivertz, P.Geo., a Canadian geologist residing in Peru, who is a “qualified person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

For additional information on St. Elias and its projects, please visit us at www.steliasmines.com for further information on IntiGold, please visitwww.intigold.com or call 1-888-895-5522 (toll free US and Canada) or contact:

US CONTACT

Herbert Haft
The Haft Group, Inc
Tel: (212) 759-8865
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]

INTIGOLD MINES LTD. AND ST. ELIAS MINES LTD.

(signed “Lori McClenahan”)

Lori McClenahan,

President

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply