Santa, garnering and supplying you with the utmost respect, I suggest that you do not judge Molson upon the presentation. Your motivation and intent is obviously contructed in such a way, that you are saying, "you don,t want to know, don,t say anything". This in fact is an obstruction of justice, which employs the technique used by criminals, to cover up, to keep quiet. Because of non transparency, the criminal world in the past has thrived, when all things are out in the open, this criminal world loses its power and implodes upon itself. When criminals first see signs of revelation, they encompass fear which makes them desperate in their attempts to cover up and secure their unethical antics, this in turn reveals their pathetism to the public, and blinds them of just how obvious they have become. Its at this point, that they still have a choice, to come clean or pursue the course of self destruct.

For you to start passing judgement on Molsons findings, without even knowing yet how it may apply to SLI, you perhaps may be displaying ignorance or even arrogance, and at this point, you should not be calling for censorship without knowing the full story, the integral details, the dynamics and the mechanisms of how organized crime may flourish.

We know how complex our story must be, when the excruciating evidence of negligence is openly depicted in the non enforcement and non interference by our government and perhaps other governments. Having said this, a full story cannot be perceived from one little piece, its when you have most of the pieces, fit them together, and watch what the big picture becomes. So its very premature and suspicious for you to ask for censorship at this point.

Organized crime only has power over you, if you have fear, if they cannot intimidate you, they become powerless.

thank you

and with much love,

rick