Please read slowly, digest and understand what I am saying in this post.

As you can see, the grades for this mine are relatively very low compared to the grades of ore from the Tesoro. The Tesoro ore is at least 4 times as rich, with perhaps even 12 times or more as rich.

They proclaim problems with cash cost, but reasonable comparison of a double of the gold grade, clearly shows how lucrative the project could be. They were putting .25 ounce ore on to the leach pads, a ~8 g/t average. With Tesoro, a lot of our gold was free milling and would be seperated easily before reaching a leach pad, the high grade gold pods are clear evidence of this. The ore that would reach the leach pad could quite easily be in the .75 ounce per ton or higher range, again, making the Tesoro perhaps 3 times more profitable than Barricks mine.

Also, if you look at the geology of Barricks mine, you will find that the major component of their mineralization, is narrow veinlets. A comparison to these veinlets and the Tesoro, would be when Lori said that not by following veins in the C-1 adit, but by just tunnelling a crosscut adit, the development material averaged 1 vounce per ton, a very high grade for development material, suggesting that there are many mineralizerd gold veinlets through that section of the C-1 area. This type of mineralization also fully agrees with what the Quantec is saying and verifies the Quantec signatures fully. For further understanding, it is very reasonable and logical to believe that the giant and other anomalies on the Tesoro are comprised of sulphides with a gold content around an ounce per ton, or perhaps higher.

And, as Lori said, its impossible to have these Quantec signatures, without comparible mineralization showing up in drill results. Therefore, if we have many confirmations of what the Quantec signatures/anomalies mean, they cannot be barren, its impossible.

BOWS math at .33 g/t gold in the giant anomaly alone, suggests close to 100 million ounces of gold, an average grade, of 1 ounce per ton, would suggest 100 times more than the 100 million ounces, thats where it gets real crazy. But throw all that away and go with what you know for sure, you are still able to come up with 6-10 million ounces on the property by measuring the mineralized veins and applying an average grade of around .26 g/t.

So, you can see that the gold possibility is out of this world, but when you take into consideration the copper compliment, which had one grade of 5% in a massive sulphide sample, and apply a conservative grade to the anomalies, the copper alone would support a mine.

You saw the old news release I put on here a couple nights ago, showing how the dykes, fault gouge, fresh granodiorite, etc, was all mineralized, this is in addition to the high grade bonanza veins. This type of mineralized structures, easily create signatures for the Quantec also, but the sulphide content has to be higher than what these contain at the surface, to give off distinct signatures as they do, further suggesting that the anomalies are higher than this type of mineralization. The mineralized shear zones are a given on the Tesoro as well as they show up in old Dynacor data, in which an average grade of around ~3 g/t was applied to the Dynacor shear zones. Dynacor is at an elevation of approximately 1300 meters below us, but these veins and structures have been followed by Dynacor to the property line adjoining the Tesoro, suggesting a depth of at least 1300 m, but, Dynacor seems to have gone deeper from their 1300m elevation below us, suggesting even greater depth to these structures. The Quantec report also mentions that the geophysical signatures discovered by them of the Tesoro, clearly seems to indicate shear zones as well. These mineralized shear zones are very important in any deposit, whereas they add economics to what otherwise would be considered costly waste rock. They also help to establish much wider mining widths of high grade mineralization.

The trenching news release was totally incomplete in the way it was presented to investors. There had to be numerous definitions of these mineralized structures other than high grade veins. Where the trenching results were totally vague, it doesn,t enable investors a clear and concise understanding of the property, nor their investment, again, we are denied the full report and are unable to make informed decisions. Although we are denied this ability, the trenching had to contain very valuable information that would have supported a generous compliment to the property, in further defining mineralization of various forms.

Hold onto your shares and stand your ground, this is huge.

This is not a stock scam, in a stock scam you would not see satelite images of actual mining and processing going on, on the property/ies, plain and simple. Although it may be easily compared to a stock scam, what happened with the share price, but thats not what is happening at all, the stock price has been manipulated down to this level in an attempt at someone shaking shares loose and gathering them up. Fortunately for us, their attempts have been foiled and they are unable to gain control of the shares needed to take this off the radar.

Sometimes, valuable deposits are left in the ground. But that doesn,t stop us from delineating the Tesoro, paying shareholders for what it is worth, and leaving the deposit intact as leverage for some country. What is the difference if the gold is in some vault, or in the ground?

IMO