Welcome To the WIN!!! St. Elias Mines HUB On AGORACOM

Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Free
AGORACOM NEWS FLASH

BREAKING NEWS!!!

Namaste Announces Signing of MOU With Canopy Growth Corporation

  • MOU with Canopy Growth Corporation  (TSX:WEED), a world-leading diversified cannabis company
  • Represents the execution of Namaste’s strategic objective to actively migrate medical cannabis consumers to a licensed producer
  • Purpose of MOU is to define the intention of Namaste and Canopy to expand their respective market positions by seeking to form multi-point working arrangements and exploring the development of new delivery devices for the consumption of cannabis

Nlogo

Hub On AGORACOM / Read Release

Message: Intigold

I was going through the circular and a thought came to mind. It may not be plausible, so please give me your thoughts on this scenario:

So we have a 25% shareholder of Intigold, with a special resolution put forth requesting the shareholders to permit him to acquire an additional 1,000,000 shares @.10 (more than double the price on the open market).

These questions come to mind:

Why would she promote for someone to have controlling interest of her company (she has approximately 109,000 shares)

What exactly does Intigold/TTAGIT have that would make Haukedal spend so much money to gain controlling shares of the company?

Could it be possible that Intigold can buy the Peruvian properties from SLI if Lori was no longer the CEO and it would now be considered a non-arms length transaction?

How many shares in Intigold do SLI shareholders have? Not many, I'm sure. It's an easy fix for her to get the properties away from us.

I could be way out in left field on this, but any feedback would be appreciated.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply