Everyone, including redsticker, anonymoose, primed repoot, regulators, authorities, etc, knows the gold is there, and the attempts at anyone saying it is not, is well out of date, we are beyond any argument concerning the validity of the gold being on the Tesoro. Any bantering back and forth is useless and only clutters and distracts this forum from more pertinent info at this time. Any poster here and any authority that has done their homework and are genuine, must only come to the conclusion that it is well, a mineable resource on the Tesoro. Anyone that begs to differ that ample gold is not present on the Tesoro, clearly has an ulterior motive, an ulterior motive that has been blatantly and incontestably exposed, time and again.

 In the first line of this news release that Buckbrush just posted, you see that with certainty, on Jan/2010, that the company confirmed the known mineralized strutures ran to depths of 1000m, upon doing any math on any of these singular veins, but more importantly, the wider mineralized structures, the gold content is totally impressive, as Bow says, "math does not lie", and any professional regulator and/or investigator would have no choice as but to come to a conclusion, that the Tesoro is a very valuable mineable resource. 

"ST. ELIAS MINES LTD. News Release 2010-02 (January 26, 2010) grade is significant and the mineralized structures tend to extend along strike for kilometres and to depths of up to 1,000 metres. To date, the Company has identified five mineralized zones with more than 50 quartz veins (having a total combined length of 9km) at the Tesoro Project and has carried out underground exploration and development work on three of these veins (C1, C2 and A4 Veins.) The veins are mesothermal, indicating that the vein structures may extend to considerable depths. The Tesoro Property has never been evaluated to depth, or to its full strike potential. This leaves a large potential for the discovery of additional mineralization. Qualified Person The data contained in this News Release has been reviewed and verified by Duncan Bain, B.Sc., P.Geo., a “qualified person” for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian securities administrators. For additional information on St. Elias and its projects, please visit us at www.steliasmines.com or call 1-888-895-5522 (toll free US and Canada). ST. ELIAS MINES LTD. (signed “Lori McClenahan”) Lori McClenahan, President "

 The focus Now, and I remind all posters here, is to fully expose the ongoing criminalities and injustices involved with this investment towards the shareholders. This case, continues to build bigger and bigger, and is presently beyond any national court of law, and if it continues, will be beyond any international court of law, as these courts now stand upon the globe. The recent police report received, has many coverups and does not enjoy full disclosure to the parties involved. When it comes down to their excuse of accomodating someones privacy at the expense of serving justice, that is when it blatantly reveals how a system actually protects concealment, which is always attached to deceit. Anyone with common sense knows that the minute transparency is jeopardized, that there is always something to hide, and this always stands in the way of justice being justly served. The only way to receive ultimate justice, is to fully expose everything always, have no reserves. For instance, the whole police report should be publicly displayed here, it is Now an important public document that was received through proper channels of disclosure. In this document, lay many areas of pertinent ommissions which clearly exposes the polce intent nt to prosecute, which in turn, makes them liable to full prosecution of the very laws they are suppose to enforce. One of the main pieces of the document that will be quite interesting, is the investigation into the stock manipulation and the RCMP findings, also, any investigation into the many conspicuous suspicious areas I revealed to them, and also, their exclusion of perhaps my contributions.