Multi-Dimensional Participant in the Canadian Wireless Industry
We Help Customers Thrive in a World Without Wires
  • Demo Video
  • Private Messages
  • Edit My Profile
  • View/Edit Portfolio

AGORACOM News Flash

AGORACOM WIRE - FRIDAY MAY 25TH, 2012

FOCUS METALS (TSXV:FMS) Changes Its Name to Focus Graphite Inc.

  • Aim to develop and manufacture the best technology graphite in the world
  • Additional shareholder value will come from investment in commercialized graphene through joint venture partner, Grafoid Inc.

Read More   |   *SPONSOR

INTERNATIONAL PBX VENTURES (TSX:PBX) Signs Copaquire Joint Venture Option Agreement - $90M Potential Payment Read More

AGORACOM Maintenance Alert: Friday Evening Downtime for About an Hour Read More

LOMIKO METALS (TSXV:LMR) Graphite and Zinc Price Outlook is Favourable Through 2013  Read More   |   *SPONSOR

 

 

Message: Responses to Questions

Generic_profile
Rank: [?]
Mail Room
Points: [?]
102
Rating: [?]
Votes: 0
  • Currently 0.0/5 Stars.
Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.

MORE QUESTIONS: in response to agoracom answers--- weak by the way

posted on Mar 27, 07 02:52PM

There must be some reason that is not clear to me why it was better to close mmWave rather than regroup and move forward and continue its operation. Can you please explain?<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:of... />

mmWave was insolvent and not savable.

*** WHY? IT WAS GENERATING NEARLY $20 MIL IN REV. SEEMS LIKE A VIABLE COMPANY TO ME. MANY COMPANIES WITH A LOT LESS SURVIVE JUST FINE.

COULD IT BE THAT YOU JUST DON'T WANT TO BE IN IT BECAUSE, AS YOU STATED, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT?


According to the Jan. 2007 press release, mmWave was responsible for over $20 million revenue in 2006. If the <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:sm... />Vancouver expansion costs are excluded from mmWave profit/loss calculations would this $20 million of revenue been considered profitable?

I cannot comment on this question/statement as I was not involved with the company at that time.

*** YOU MAY NOT WANT TO COMMENT ON IT, BUT DOESN'T CHANGE, THE $20 MIL IN REV. WAS THERE. IT IS NOT PHATHOMABLE THAT A MEAR DELAY ELIMINATED ALL THE VALUE OF MMWAVE.

Why would WLSA sell the company for a meager $5mil for a company expected to earn $1M a year. (5x is less then half the market avg.)

The sale price is actually $7Million CAD which is 7x the net income.

** EVEN 7X IS A POOR OFFER AND YOU KNOW IT JOHN. THE AVERAGE IS MORE IN THE 10-15X RANGE.

LOOK AT IT FROM A P.E. RATIO. WLSA MAKES $1 MILLION INCOME / BY THE OUTSTANDING SHARES = OVER 3 CENTS A SHARE EARNINGS.

YOU YOURSELF IN 2005 STATED 10X P.E. IS LOW. SO WLSA SHOULD BE SOLD FOR AT LEAST 30 CENTS A SHARE. EVEN A FRIEND DISCOUNT OF 20-25 CENTS AT A MINIMUM. SALE PRICE OF $8-10 MIL US AND NO LESS

12 CENTS / SHARE IS UNEXCEPTABLE.

Simmond, the fact you posted this deal right after the conf. call shows you know this was in the works and you should not have been talking this company down. You took over this company when the stock was trading at 18 cents a share, but took an offer of 10-12 cent on a sale.?

We know your history Simmonds. You have pumped up many a company in your time and its not right you take Wlsa out at the knees and then sell it low. Where was the pump up? OH THAT IS RIGHT, you pump it up when you already own shares, if you want to buy you beat it down and get them cheap. At least that is how it appears.

New Message

Please login to post a reply

AGORACOM Quick Tips

Breaking Small-Cap News Delivered to your Smart Phone! Grab our RSS Feed
Watch
Today's Show
in 00:00:000

President's D.D.

New feature: Hub Presidents can add important links here.

Stock Quote