Good summary Tada. I would imagine any complaint's etc would have to be strongly backed up with factual information before acted upon?

One just can't say you don't  like the fella & belive something nefarious is going on, if that's all it took the market would end up paralyzed. I also don't believe failed forward looking statements can be used regardless of how many there have been as my understanding is that's all protected writing/speech under the rules?

Going by the last vote & increasingly higher unfavourable rate towards the ceo is one powerful way to show one's dissatisfaction. Bottom line is unless your an insider that has material wrong doing I doubt much of any action would take place. Even though I'm disgusted with this ceo & bod I don't have any proof of wrong doing so as PO'd as i am , i'm forced to either stew in my anger or be hopeful that chatter of some sort of action & the recent significant vote against the ceo acts as a wake up call.

Its a frustrating & paralyzing stiuation from where i sit.