interesting. unfortunately i don`t have the time to dig deep but i`m sure the headline numbers will catch peoples attention.

that said, the way the numbers are presented leaves a bad tast in my mouth...

lets say you have 3m of 701 grams and you double the length to 6m with no further gold ... that 6m would grade 350 grams ....lets say you double the length again this time to 12m with no further gold, the grade over 12m would be 175 grams ....double again to 24m with no further gold and the grade 88grams ...double again to 48 m and your at 44grams ....

here are the companies numbers...

``The new high-grade zone in the Beaver Pond area was confirmed with Hole NR09-446 intersecting 51.0 metres grading 42.5 g/t (1.24 oz/t) gold including 6.0 metres grading 352.84 g/t (10.29 oz/t) gold, including 701.29 g/t (20.45 oz/t) gold over 3.0 metres.``

so really they got 3 awesome meters, the rest of the intercept contributed next to no gold. personally i think it is pretty poor way to report and it reaks of scam.

regards,

Buck