Question:...........RE: Pending Tabasquena SG3 anomaly test
are you able to compare the size of the two anomalies? at this point a lot has been extracted from Fresnillo but which one is bigger if that can be answered...
thanks
R
Response:..........
Homelesstrader:
Fresnillo is slightly bigger if you factor in volume comparisons between it and Tabasquena down to the same known Fresnillo ore body depth limits, but when taking into account the significantly deeper Tabasquena system depth, puts it well out ahead if one could mine down to 2800 meters.
There is also a much higher likelihood that when taking into account the surprising high-grade gold reveal in hole 2, that the environment where the Tabasquena SG3 anomaly resides, could as well have that much more capacity to host considerably higher levels of gold mineralization than Fresnillo
Read more at http://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=v.aax&postid=28437784#MWR2gQlmr5bFTCbW.99
