Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Message: Share swap

"Galore is going to end up with a feasibility study as well.  SC's FS is done and has been reviewed by third party and by Teck and everything is current from it.  They even established the tonnes milled per day.  In my opinion, I feel SC is more advance than Galore."

That's right, Calvin, SC does have a valid FS, but for some reason Explorationguy dismisses that fact, saying "Teck's not accepting it", though they've "booked" the mineral assets and upped the tonnage per day from 120k to 133k (from memory).

We haven't "missed the copper cycle" either and won't "sit here for another 6 years" (due to missed commodity cycle).  Every analyst keeps predicting the next (copper) commodity boom and they keep getting it wrong.  Just look at the price trend of copper and the slowdown in global growth.

Doesn't matter that Teck is planning to spend "$24 to $40 million annually at Galore over the next 3-4 years with their partner Newmont".  We're almost at the end of the development stage and have a FS in hand, while Galore has a long way to go just to get their PFS.   Comparing the spend at Galore to Schaft Creek, when they are at completey different phases of development is, to me, misleading and disingenuous. 


New Message
Please login to post a reply