I don't think anyone is trying to disrupt. I think all I have done is as you say: express the opposing opinion to opting in (based on my interpretation of what the judge said).

There are many many more opinions to the contrary constantly re-affirming and encouraging shareholders to opt-in - as you say: shoving it down our throats. Mine is just a single solitary opinion in one post (followed by trying to answer any questions about that post) - I plan to continue to answer those questions / accusations but to ignore personal attacks.

I clearly have a different view on the situation to many here. I see no harm in expressing that view - it is not as if we are trading or have any say in what is going on. Do you as hub leaders object to hearing a different view that may not be the same as yours?