Paau you already know the answer to these questions.

If Crystallex' data were worth anything wouldn't VZ have included it in their settlement agreement as they did with GRZ?

You and Tenor would love us to think the mining data has no value but what you are trying to twist is the mining data has no value to Tenor and they could care less about shareholders who own the data. If Tenor was eligible to get 88% of the mining data value then it would have been listed just like GRZ. While you won't admit it, you know full well Tenor has no claim to the data or its value.

You're suggesting the HONEST Fung and Tenor wouldn't tell the monitor and court the mining data has no value to benefit themselves. Try to buy out exisiting shareholders for the 10 cents you want us to take and then sell the worthless data to GRZ and VZ for $300 million cutting shareholders out again. That actually sounds exactly like what Fung and Tenor would do IMO.

And talking of JJ, does he realise that even if Crystallex found $200m in other assets, Tenor would take 88% of that too, simply by converting their DIP share to equity? I hope this is simply ignorance but if so why insinuate I have any motive other than sharing information?

If that was true then Tenor would do it but we both know they won't for various reasons don't we Paau. It isn't ignorance on your part Paau, it is misinformation. Keeping trying.