I didn't save it. A one paragraph with a few pertinent facts like:
Fung stated in his original meeting with the Canadian bankruptcy judge that he was all about protecting shareholder value.
Fung has done everything possible to destroy shareholder value on purpose.
Fung gave away 88% of the judgement to Tenor in Canadian courts.
Fung became a board member of the Tenor group.
Does Tenor deserve nearly the entire award of 1.6 billion for under a 100 million investment at the expense of the investors that kept KRY alive while it was an active company?
Anything else you can add. short but factually correct statements.
And make sure it is addressed to Judge Hon Laurie Silverstein; not Jaurie listed in my original post. lol