Mosaic ImmunoEngineering is a nanotechnology-based immunotherapy company developing therapeutics and vaccines to positively impact the lives of patients and their families.

Free
Message: more Fish....

more Fish....

posted on Jan 28, 2007 07:27PM
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORP
 Form:S-1  Filing Date:2/20/2003
Jump to :  -- Use Sections To Navigate Through The Document -- S-1 FORM S-1 PROSPECTUS SUMMARY RISK FACTORS BENEFICIAL OWNERS USE OF PROCEEDS SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA COMPENSATION TABLE OPTIONS OPTIONS (AGGREGATE) BENEFICIAL OWNERS EXPERTS INCOME STATEMENT STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY CASH FLOW INCOME STATEMENT CASH FLOW ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION. EXHIBIT 5.1 EXHIBIT 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS EXHIBIT 23.3 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS EXHIBIT 99.8 EXHIBIT 99.9 Format :  HTML RTF Sections Excel Original PDF    File     Back     
						

In January 1999, we were sued in the Superior Court of San Diego County, California by the Fish Family Trust, a co-inventor of the original ShBoom technology. The suit also named as defendants nanoTronics and Gloria Felcyn on behalf of the Falk Family Trust. The suit sought a judgment for damages, a rescission of the Technology Transfer Agreement and a restoration of the technology to the co-inventor. In March 1999, we joined with nanoTronics and Gloria Felcyn and filed our response and cross-complaint against the Fish Family Trust. In November 2000, the judge issued a summary ruling in favor of the defendants on all counts. The Fish Family Trust filed an appeal in January 2001. Management believes that it is unlikely that the appellate court will overturn the trial court's ruling and that the resolution of the appeal process will have no impact on our financial position, income or cash flows.

In September 2001, an action was filed against us in the Superior Court of San Diego County, California by Richard G. Blum, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Blum contended that he was wrongfully terminated on August 5, 2001 in violation of his employment agreement dated December 1, 2000. He sought damages for the alleged breach of his employment agreement, age discrimination, as well as other related claims. In October 2002, we entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Blum whereby we agreed to pay him $60,000 over twelve months and to issue him 400,000 shares of our common stock. This liability has been recorded in our consolidated financial statements for the six months ended November 30, 2002.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply